Inger skrev:http://www.aehf.com/articles/em_sensitive.html
Hmm...
"A second phase involved a single-blind challenge ..."
"We also noted that patients sometimes had delayed or prolonged responses."
"In this study, of the 100 patients who expressed suspicion of EMF sensitivity, 75 actually responded to fields, whereas none of the controls did. Of the 75, 25 had no reactions to blanks, whereas 50 did, and thus were discarded from the study; ..."
"They were often unwell for several hours or days, which confused the data from repeat challenges on subsequent days."
"Signs and symptoms appeared similar to those seen in food or chemically sensitive patients at the Environmental Health Center-Dallas, and included neurological, musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, dermal, and ocular changes."
"In our experience over the years, we have found partial reproduction of symptoms on repeat challenge to be as significant as total reproduction."
"This patient was also sensitive to dust, weeds, dust mites, and some foods. [...] He then received an antigen shot to neutralize his hypersensitivity reactions. Five months later, he was unreactive to EMF; (d) weather changes might affect the results, since we know that the weather can influence the propagation of EMF, as may alterations in the geomagnetic fields."
"Adverse weather (inversions, for example) may increase pollution load, while good weather lessens it."
Nu har jag läst studien; Den gör väldigt mycket för att styrka uppfattningen att det är en hittepååkomma.
Symptomen är inte påhittade, de finns, och patienterna bör få hjälp.