Individualism

av **Svaboda** » 2015-05-08 23:30:24

Indulgence instead of abstinence

I do not understand what people gain by denying themselves pleasure. If you want to watch porn, do it! If you want to drink alcohol, do it! Religion prevents their followers to have indulgence. Religion claims that the psychical world is threatening the spiritual world. Therefore, religion is preventing people to gain their physically but also psychologically pleasure. However, if you refrain from some of the pleasures. Not only will you have a bigger enjoyment later, you will also learn to have patience and discipline. Release the chains that religion is keeping you in and fly, free like a bird and do whatever you want to!

Vital existence instead of spiritual pipe dreams!

Reality and existence, is not that important to you? You walk around, thinking about the paradise. Living in abstinence, in frugality and in self-restraint. Reality and existence is sacred and should never be sacrificed! A pipe dream is when you think faith exists, when you believe in creators of man, in heaven etc. Quit this bullshit! Live in the present, you will only have one time at this earth. Make it count!

Spoiler: visa

Kindness to those who deserve it, instead of love wasted on ingrates

Individualism is not about encouraging people to be cruel or unkind against other human’s beings. But, tell me! Why the hell are people spending time and energy on people that won’t appreciate it or reciprocate it? I was told when I was young, treat people as you want to be treated. And it’s true!

“The statement about Love is almost different as one can be kind without feeling love. One can be kind to a total stranger simply out of animal-human decency. Love is a feeling; it shines out of the heart area in a gentle way, like sunshine. It doesn't feel like anything to be loved, but it feels like joy to love someone or something. Love comes all of a sudden, and it goes just as suddenly. Normal healthy people would just let it go when it's gone and not try to force something to exist when it's gone. When you do that, Love turns to obligation and then to hate.”

Don’t love people that don’t deserve it, and when you feel it is time to go. GO! Don’t waste your energy, love, kindness on somebody who is an jackass!

Vengeance instead of turning the other cheek!

If someone does something to you and you turn the other cheek. I would like to ask you, what is your purpose doing this? The asshole will keep doing it to you, and to others. Those who do not stand up for themselves will be tramped, and the self-esteem would decrease. Vengeance is allowed! In our society, revenge is not accepted! We have laws, protecting the scums! Revenge is not about letting someone else taking care of it; it’s your indulgence to physically smashing the shit out of the enemy.

The so-called sins...

All of the “sins” is labeled as something bad in religion, but most of these “sins” leads to physically, mental or emotional pleasure. Don’t avoid doing things you like because some old man made up a story a story that brainwashed people. Do what you want! When you avoid things, you have concrete reasons. Not because some old man has judged it as bad. If you realize that you have done something bad (I don’t mean sins), you accept it, learn from it and do not do it again. Instead, you guys mentally beat yourself down and ask God for forgiveness. I hope he didn’t answer, because then you are psychotic! Stop self-deceit yourself!

Undefiled wisdom instead of hypocritical self-deceit.

Undefiled wisdom is about knowing the hard truth about yourself. If you are dumb, recognize it! Instead, people claims to be something that they are not. This is pure hypocritical self-deceit. It’s not okay to tell lies and deceive other people, but it´s even worse to do it to yourself!

"Hypocritical SELF deceit is when e.g., you claim to be in favor of Freedom of Speech and yet are your own inner censor, cry over rude words that might "hurt someone's feelings" even so the words are only exposing a liar to be: "A LIAR!" Such a person is not and cannot be in favor of Free Speech because they do not even practice it. They deceive themselves in thinking they are for it. It is deceiving yourself to be anything you are not. Such people tend to go into ballistic reaction mode when someone who really knows something comes around and smashes their little fortress of lies. Then they can be seen to go into self-destructive behavior and also retreat to their old faith: belief in lies despite evidence to the contrary. Self-deceit is a tall subject because 99% of the Christian world lives and breathes in a Sea of Lies: their own culture. They are not self-aware enough to even know they deceive themselves. They are the enemies of self-sincerity inside their own selves. hypocritical self-deceit is the fool screaming about sexual freedom when he never even got off who really has another agenda aside from freedom to work if you are sexually different, and who would know if he doesn't blab it all over to uninterested others? His agenda has more to do with acceptance by others since he obviously does not accept himself. You can spot them: they'd try to preach this bullshit to people who have been having sex quite naturally since they were 13 years old or so. This is hypocritical self-deceit. This is not the same thing as a hypocrite! Self-deceit is not the same as deceiving others.”

http://www.myenglishclub.com/profiles/b ... ividualism

atoms -

Det är brukligt att ange varifrån ett citat härstammar. Det är även önskvärt att man lämnar någon kommentar till den citerade texten, särskilt om det man citerar inte är på svenska. Dolde merparten av citatet då det var onödigt långt.

Detta är ett påpekande.
------------
Nyttig läsning: Forumregler | Netikett

av **KrigarSjäl** » 2015-05-08 23:59:16

-Fördel vore du anger källa för citat samt presterar egna tankar och frågeställningar.

av **bardamu** » 2015-05-09 0:00:11

Låter som något från satanistisk litteratur...

Satanism brukar vara populärt bland tonåringar.

av **plåtmonster** » 2015-05-09 0:33:57

Ha kul och inse verkligheten? Kul manifest iaf utan de vanliga skygglapparna

Källa?

Tycker inte alls det är sataniskt. Det finns inte ens något om att plåga andra om man tycker det är givande.

av **bardamu** » 2015-05-09 0:40:24

Nja tror inte satanism handlar om att plåga människor. Det handlar väl om hedonism som man förväxlat med individualism.

Det är fånigt pompöst dravel i vilket fall.

av **Wine** » 2015-05-09 9:04:54

plåtmonster skrev:Ha kul och inse verkligheten? Kul manifest iaf utan de vanliga skygglapparna
Källa?

Tycker inte alls det är sataniskt. Det finns inte ens något om att plåga andra om man tycker det är givande.

Wikipedia - The Satanic Bible

Prologue

The prologue to The Satanic Bible begins by discussing the concept of gods, good and evil, and human nature. It includes the Nine Satanic Statements:

Satan represents indulgence, instead of abstinence!
Satan represents vital existence, instead of spiritual pipe dreams!
Satan represents undefiled wisdom, instead of hypocritical self-deceit!
Satan represents kindness to those who deserve it, instead of love wasted on ingrates!
Satan represents vengeance, instead of turning the other cheek!
Satan represents responsibility to the responsible, instead of concern for psychic vampires!
Satan represents man as just another animal, sometimes better, more often worse than those that walk on all-fours, who, because of his "divine spiritual and intellectual development," has become the most vicious animal of all!
Satan represents all of the so-called sins, as they all lead to physical, mental, or emotional gratification!
Satan has been the best friend the church has ever had, as he has kept it in business all these years![41]

The Nine Satanic Statements outline the basic ideology of LaVeyan Satanism, and have become some of the guiding principles of LaVeyan Satanism. They also served as a template for later publications by LaVey, such as his 1987 "Nine Satanic Sins".

av **Svaboda** » 2015-05-09 11:49:53

Källor:
http://www.necronomi.com/magic/satanism/CoS9.html
The satanic bible
Men jag gillar inte satanismen skiten så sållade bort det!

av **Svaboda** » 2015-05-09 11:52:08

Wine skrev:
plåtmonster skrev:Ha kul och inse verkligheten? Kul manifest iaf utan de vanliga skygglapparna
Källa?

Tycker inte alls det är sataniskt. Det finns inte ens något om att plåga andra om man tycker det är givande.

Wikipedia - The Satanic Bible

Prologue

The prologue to The Satanic Bible begins by discussing the concept of gods, good and evil, and human nature. It includes the Nine Satanic Statements:

Satan represents indulgence, instead of abstinence!
Satan represents vital existence, instead of spiritual pipe dreams!
Satan represents undefiled wisdom, instead of hypocritical self-deceit!
Satan represents kindness to those who deserve it, instead of love wasted on ingrates!
Satan represents vengeance, instead of turning the other cheek!
Satan represents responsibility to the responsible, instead of concern for psychic vampires!
Satan represents man as just another animal, sometimes better, more often worse than those that walk on all-fours, who, because of his "divine spiritual and intellectual development," has become the most vicious animal of all!
Satan represents all of the so-called sins, as they all lead to physical, mental, or emotional gratification!
Satan has been the best friend the church has ever had, as he has kept it in business all these years![41]

The Nine Satanic Statements outline the basic ideology of LaVeyan Satanism, and have become some of the guiding principles of LaVeyan Satanism. They also served as a template for later publications by LaVey, such as his 1987 "Nine Satanic Sins".

Så du menar att hela boken är av ren satanism? Det är en blandning av satanism, individualism och materialism.

av **stuck** » 2015-05-12 18:15:41

Texten som TS citerar försöker behandla ett ämne som faktiskt är riktigt djupt och kan bli funnet i många gamla och nya psykologiska teorier.
Felet i texten som TS citerar, är att den saknar de djupgående förklaringarna som krävs. samt att den vill få det till induvidualism vs religion. Ett stort misstag och ett förringande av de psykologiska teorier som ligger bakom.
Det passar sig faktiskt att det i princip är mitt "specialämne" just nu.Det är mycket möjligt att jag återkommer med en förklaring på vad som ligger bakom resonemanget i texten.

Individualism

Individualism

Individualism

Individualism

Individualism

Individualism

Individualism

Individualism

Individualism

Individualism

Vilka är online

Om AspergerForum

Logga in